Clinical observation of Zhen'ai needling method in Nei Jing (classic of internal medicine) for children with allergic rhinitis accompanied by adenoid hypertrophy
Item
Title
Clinical observation of Zhen'ai needling method in Nei Jing (classic of internal medicine) for children with allergic rhinitis accompanied by adenoid hypertrophy
Description
J Acupunct Tuina Sci (2020), Cui-hong, Zhang; Zhan-wen, Liu; Jue, Hong; Jie, Liu; Chen, Xie; Ling-xiang, Wu; Yan-ting, Yang; Xiao-peng, Ma.
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of Zhen’ai needling method in Nei Jing (Classic of Internal Medicine) for children with allergic rhinitis (AR) accompanied by adenoid hypertrophy (AH).
Methods: A total of 74 children who met the screening criteria were divided into a Zhen’ai group and a control group by the random number table method, with 37 cases in each group. The control group was treated with acupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36), Hegu (LI 4), Yingxiang (LI 20), Juliao (ST 3), Yintang (GV 29), Shangxing (GV 23) and Baihui (GV 20). The Zhen’ai group added points of Zhen’ai needling method {Shanglianquan [Extra, located at 1 cun above Lianquan (CV 23)], Tianrong (SI 17) and Lieque (LU 7)} in addition to the points in the control group. The needles were retained for 30 min. The treatment was performed twice a week. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS), sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) and symptom scale for AH (SSAH) were assessed before and after 10 treatments. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared after treatment.
Results: During the treatment, 5 cases dropped out in the control group and 2 cases in the Zhen’ai group. After treatment, the total effective rate of the Zhen’ai group was 94.3%, versus 93.8% in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The markedly effective rate of the Zhen’ai group was 42.9%, versus 12.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, there were significant intra-group differences in the scores of TNSS, SNOT-20 and SSAH in both groups (all P<0.05); the scores of SNOT-20 and SSAH in the Zhen’ai group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (both P<0.05).
Conclusion: Both conventional acupuncture and conventional acupuncture plus Zhen’ai needling method can improve clinical symptoms of children with AR accompanied by AH; and conventional acupuncture plus Zhen’ai needling method has a better effect than conventional acupuncture in improving AH symptoms.
Methods: A total of 74 children who met the screening criteria were divided into a Zhen’ai group and a control group by the random number table method, with 37 cases in each group. The control group was treated with acupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36), Hegu (LI 4), Yingxiang (LI 20), Juliao (ST 3), Yintang (GV 29), Shangxing (GV 23) and Baihui (GV 20). The Zhen’ai group added points of Zhen’ai needling method {Shanglianquan [Extra, located at 1 cun above Lianquan (CV 23)], Tianrong (SI 17) and Lieque (LU 7)} in addition to the points in the control group. The needles were retained for 30 min. The treatment was performed twice a week. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS), sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) and symptom scale for AH (SSAH) were assessed before and after 10 treatments. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared after treatment.
Results: During the treatment, 5 cases dropped out in the control group and 2 cases in the Zhen’ai group. After treatment, the total effective rate of the Zhen’ai group was 94.3%, versus 93.8% in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The markedly effective rate of the Zhen’ai group was 42.9%, versus 12.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, there were significant intra-group differences in the scores of TNSS, SNOT-20 and SSAH in both groups (all P<0.05); the scores of SNOT-20 and SSAH in the Zhen’ai group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (both P<0.05).
Conclusion: Both conventional acupuncture and conventional acupuncture plus Zhen’ai needling method can improve clinical symptoms of children with AR accompanied by AH; and conventional acupuncture plus Zhen’ai needling method has a better effect than conventional acupuncture in improving AH symptoms.
Alternative Title
J Acupunct Tuina Sci
Creator
Date
Language
English
Subject
doi
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11726-020-1193-9
issn
1672-3597
issue
4
page end
314
page start
308
volume
18